<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Newb about Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilwood.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilwood.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Technical innovation and frustration from the heart of Silicon Field.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:05:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;m defecting from SharePointistan by neilwood</title>
		<link>http://neilwood.wordpress.com/2009/02/18/im-defecting-from-sharepointistan/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>neilwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilwood.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Well hopefully you got the good as well as the bad out of it.  There has been more written about the pitfalls of expecting SharePoint to be a magic bullet lately that reiterate my point about broken processes and people problems that are the source of pain rather than any given content management system.   Bud Porter-Roth with Integrated Solutions Magazine &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isminfo.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1429&amp;Itemid=109&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;agrees&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well hopefully you got the good as well as the bad out of it.  There has been more written about the pitfalls of expecting SharePoint to be a magic bullet lately that reiterate my point about broken processes and people problems that are the source of pain rather than any given content management system.   Bud Porter-Roth with Integrated Solutions Magazine <a href="http://www.isminfo.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1429&amp;Itemid=109" rel="nofollow">agrees</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;m defecting from SharePointistan by Colin</title>
		<link>http://neilwood.wordpress.com/2009/02/18/im-defecting-from-sharepointistan/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilwood.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-14</guid>
		<description>&quot;this post shouldn’t be summarily construed as a “SharePoint is crap” post&quot;

too bad, that&#039;s what I typed in google!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;this post shouldn’t be summarily construed as a “SharePoint is crap” post&#8221;</p>
<p>too bad, that&#8217;s what I typed in google!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;m defecting from SharePointistan by Robert Wales</title>
		<link>http://neilwood.wordpress.com/2009/02/18/im-defecting-from-sharepointistan/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Wales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilwood.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Hear Hear.

You make the point, but don&#039;t emphasize it quite the way I would if I were making the case--it all comes down to the perspective from which SP was developed by Microsoft. Or what did they *think* they were developing when they developed it?

In fact and deed, it seems pretty clear that the mission behind Microsoft&#039;s Sharepoint development project was to create a platform that a) provides extensive Office (their real &quot;platform&quot;) lock-in and b) offers CMS functionality.

Which is to say, it was never first and foremost a development platform, or if it was it was only expected to be used as an extension of that *other* development platform, Office. And it&#039;s pretty rare in software that things grow beyond their initial DNA without much additional development, so here we are stuck with Microsoft&#039;s (IMO limited) vision for Sharepoint.

Read &quot;Breaking Windows&quot; and you&#039;ll see this perspective in action over and over again. They call it the &quot;Windows Tax,&quot; though there is now a corollary in &quot;Office Tax.&quot; Thou shalt not develop anything that might, when released to the marketplace, tend to undercut [Windows &#124; Office], and in fact, you should work harder to bend your innovation so that it sells more [Windows &#124; Office].

And unfortunately, profound mediocrity is the result. Thanks for having the honesty to just say it.

- RBW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear Hear.</p>
<p>You make the point, but don&#8217;t emphasize it quite the way I would if I were making the case&#8211;it all comes down to the perspective from which SP was developed by Microsoft. Or what did they *think* they were developing when they developed it?</p>
<p>In fact and deed, it seems pretty clear that the mission behind Microsoft&#8217;s Sharepoint development project was to create a platform that a) provides extensive Office (their real &#8220;platform&#8221;) lock-in and b) offers CMS functionality.</p>
<p>Which is to say, it was never first and foremost a development platform, or if it was it was only expected to be used as an extension of that *other* development platform, Office. And it&#8217;s pretty rare in software that things grow beyond their initial DNA without much additional development, so here we are stuck with Microsoft&#8217;s (IMO limited) vision for Sharepoint.</p>
<p>Read &#8220;Breaking Windows&#8221; and you&#8217;ll see this perspective in action over and over again. They call it the &#8220;Windows Tax,&#8221; though there is now a corollary in &#8220;Office Tax.&#8221; Thou shalt not develop anything that might, when released to the marketplace, tend to undercut [Windows | Office], and in fact, you should work harder to bend your innovation so that it sells more [Windows | Office].</p>
<p>And unfortunately, profound mediocrity is the result. Thanks for having the honesty to just say it.</p>
<p>- RBW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A First Look at VSTS 2010 by Erik Cox</title>
		<link>http://neilwood.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/a-first-look-at-vsts-2010/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilwood.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Yeah it does seem like 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.notionsolutions.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;VS 2010&lt;/a&gt; will bring BIG things...but until I see I don&#039;t believe it..that is just the way I am...but nevertheless I like reading about it as much as I can get ma hands on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it does seem like<br />
<a href="http://www.notionsolutions.com" rel="nofollow">VS 2010</a> will bring BIG things&#8230;but until I see I don&#8217;t believe it..that is just the way I am&#8230;but nevertheless I like reading about it as much as I can get ma hands on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BizTalk Leaving Developers Hanging by neongreen</title>
		<link>http://neilwood.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/biztalk-leaving-developers-hanging/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>neongreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilwood.wordpress.com/?p=46#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Yeah I know about the &quot;compatibility issues&quot; of BizTalk and 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.notionsolutions.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;VS 2008&lt;/a&gt;...and i know that it is announced that the matter will be solved with BizTalk 2009....but it is too far away for me..so I hope that at that MS event webinar you mentioned someone might offer a quick and easy soulution to it....but seriously I do expect a solution to be presented but for the easy and quick part I seriously doubt it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I know about the &#8220;compatibility issues&#8221; of BizTalk and<br />
<a href="http://www.notionsolutions.com" rel="nofollow">VS 2008</a>&#8230;and i know that it is announced that the matter will be solved with BizTalk 2009&#8230;.but it is too far away for me..so I hope that at that MS event webinar you mentioned someone might offer a quick and easy soulution to it&#8230;.but seriously I do expect a solution to be presented but for the easy and quick part I seriously doubt it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BizTalk Leaving Developers Hanging by Andy James</title>
		<link>http://neilwood.wordpress.com/2008/11/18/biztalk-leaving-developers-hanging/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilwood.wordpress.com/?p=46#comment-5</guid>
		<description>This is a known issue and is solved with the release of BizTalk 2009 early next year. 

As always the BizTalk and Viz studio offerings are out of sync...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a known issue and is solved with the release of BizTalk 2009 early next year. </p>
<p>As always the BizTalk and Viz studio offerings are out of sync&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Smart Art degrades by Roger</title>
		<link>http://neilwood.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/smart-art-degrades/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilwood.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/smart-art-degrades/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Have you tried building the smart art in PowerPoint and then right clicking to save as picture first rather than using the clipboard to get it into Paint.Net?  I have had better results with that method for the task you&#039;re describing.

Roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried building the smart art in PowerPoint and then right clicking to save as picture first rather than using the clipboard to get it into Paint.Net?  I have had better results with that method for the task you&#8217;re describing.</p>
<p>Roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
